Teleprompter for sale
![teleprompter for sale teleprompter for sale](https://www.bhphotovideo.com/images/images2500x2500/autocue_qtv_ocu_ssp12ulite_12_starter_series_ultra_1120588.jpg)
Some folks like William and Mary athletic director Terry Driscoll, say there's not a big "appetite" at the FCS level cost of attendance. Imagine Liberty instituting FCOA, while Charleston Southern decides it can't afford it.
#Teleprompter for sale tv#
In conferences where there isn't that fat TV paycheck, FCOA could be something that blows things apart. For them, what's adding $2 million a year to the value of their existing scholarships? It's just a portion of the proceeds they'd be getting anyway in TV money.īut in an FCS conference like, for example, the Big South, the athletic spending gap between the rich (Liberty, spending: $28 million) and more modest (Charleston Southern, spending: $10 million) can be staggering. In a Power 5 conference, the gap between, say, Ohio State and Northwestern is significant, but not insurmountable, especially when all its members are getting upwards of $20 million from their TV contract or more. To me, this is an issue of grave concern in the FCS specifically.
#Teleprompter for sale full#
In other words, conferences are saying - schools, we can't stop you if we want to institute full cost of attendance. Since the legislation is considered official NCAA legislation - permissive or not - attempting to prohibit a group's members from enacting "permissive" legislation appears something that FCS commissioners are not eager to challenge legally.
![teleprompter for sale teleprompter for sale](https://img.joomcdn.net/185e3f94d57315fe4d0dbe0694b11701222fc615_1024_1024.jpeg)
Though it's "permissive" on the per-school level, it's not being something optional at the conference level for consideration. "The decision whether or not to follow NCAA autonomous legislation is completely up to each Division I institution." "Our league, like many other conferences, has been advised by legal counsel against colluding as an organization, prohibiting our members from following approved NCAA legislation," he said. Thus, Southland members can follow any of the autonomous legislation."Īnd why can't there be a conference mandate to tell members to, say, not implement FCOA for its football programs? The group determined that the autonomy legislation be permissive for Southland athletic programs to apply as they see fit, but that there be no Conference mandate to either follow the autonomy rules or to prohibit any member from doing so. "Following the approval in January of the five autonomy items," he said, "all of which are permissive but not mandated for the remainder of Division I membership, the presidents met again to discuss future possibilities. Unfortunately in terms of implementation, that's not how it works at the FCS level.Ī recent Q&A by Southland commissioner Tom Burnett was a real eye-opener as to the impacts of full cost of attendance, something that all the Southland presidents were reportedly against.
![teleprompter for sale teleprompter for sale](https://www.creatorbeat.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/Teleprompter-blog-Retina.png)
Supposedly full cost of attendance is considered "permissive" legislation, meaning, NCAA members outside of the P5 can implement its changes if they wish.
![teleprompter for sale teleprompter for sale](https://cdn10.bigcommerce.com/s-2cnws/products/412/images/2222/Flex_Plus_Desktop_24_Face__18425.1608483556.1280.1280.jpg)
And at the FCS level, it seems like the strategy is to simply hope and pray that nobody decides to implement it for their own athletic departments. Sadly, it's still every bit as complicated - and unbalancing - as the many critics of FCOA feared. Now, as the Power 5 wanted all along, FCOA is here. It led to the Power 5 asking for autonomy over the rest of the NCAA's membership to all them to enact their own legislation for themselves, without a vote by the rest of the membership. It's been legislation that the "Power 5" schools have wanted to enact for years, surviving an embarrassing legislative loss when the rest of the NCAA's membership voted in 2011 against the original proposal crafted by NCAA president Mark Emmert and many members of the Power 5 leadership. In January, the eighty schools of the "Power 5" FBS football conferences voted 79-1 to allow its members to offer additional money above the cost of a scholarship - up to the "full cost of attendance" of the school. Start getting used to the term "full cost of attendance", or, as many who are obsessed about college sports are calling it, "FCOA".